ESP32 Bluetooth "Backdoor": Hype, Reality, and the Future of IoT Security

Last week yielded another headline that sounded like a cybersecurity nightmare: “Undocumented backdoor found in Bluetooth chip used by a billion devices.” The chip in question? The widely used ESP32 microcontroller from Espressif, a powerhouse in IoT and embedded applications. With its affordability and ease of use, the ESP32 has become the backbone of smart home devices, industrial automation, and even hobbyist projects.

If true, this discovery would be nothing short of catastrophic. A backdoor in a wireless-enabled device would allow remote attackers to compromise IoT networks effortlessly. Imagine a scenario where an attacker, parked in an unassuming car outside your home, could inject malicious commands into your 2.5 GHz only WiFi or bluetooth connected smart oven.

But as is often the case in cybersecurity, the reality is more nuanced. Let’s break down what was actually found, how the security community reacted, and what this means for the future of ESP32 security.

The Headline That Shook the IoT World

The initial report was slightly sensationalized, and made it seem that undocumented Bluetooth commands in the ESP32 firmware could allow attackers to spoof trusted devices, access unauthorized data, and pivot into networked systems. The findings pointed to 29 undocumented HCI (Host Controller Interface) commands that could interact with ESP32’s Bluetooth stack to allow: 

• Reading and writing memory

• Sending Bluetooth packets and addressing the network stack

• Manipulating MAC addresses

At first glance, these options are alarming indeed. However, the commands are only accessible from within the device itself, meaning an attacker would already need to have access to use them — a far cry from the wireless remote exploit implied.

The Real Issue: Transparency and Accountability

Once the story gained momentum, Espressif issued a formal statement clarifying that the undocumented HCI commands were meant for internal debugging and development purposes.

Whilst these commands could not be considered an inherent security risk, they could still potentially be misused if a device is already compromised.

The incident also highlights a lack of transparency in how IoT firmware is developed, and that there are gaps in legislation that would require that manufacturers document and/or disable debugging features in production versions of their products.

The Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) is designed to enforce security-by-design principles, requiring manufacturers to document, test, and secure their Products with Digital Elements (PDEs) before releasing them to the market. Had CRA been in place earlier, these hidden Bluetooth commands would likely have surfaced much sooner, and controlled, or eliminated before in newer generations of products.

The Need for Stronger IoT Security Standards

Despite the overblown headlines, this discovery underscores a crucial point: IoT security needs to be taken seriously. Even though this particular case turned out to be a non-issue, the situation brings attention to a broader trend in IoT - time-to-market conditions and budget constraints force developers and manufacturers to prioritize convenience over security. 

The only was to combat is to create frameworks that either require or incentivise a cybersecurity baseline in products that enter mainstream markets.

In recent years, we've seen both approaches in action. The Cyber Resilience Act establishes mandatory security requirements for connected devices, categorizing them by their intended use and criticality while holding manufacturers and importers accountable for compliance failures.

On the other hand, the U.S. Cyber Trust Mark follows a voluntary approach, providing a security label to help consumers make informed choices about purchasing secure IoT products that have undergone testing and are secure by design.

For security professionals, this also presents an opportunity to educate decision-makers on distinguishing real vs. perceived threats in IoT security — potentially saving IT teams from unnecessary, time-consuming hunts for ESP32-enabled devices in their networks.

A Smarter Approach to IoT Security

The ESP32 situation is a reminder that cybersecurity is about more than just patching vulnerabilities—it’s about ensuring trust, transparency, and resilience in our supply chains. 

This is the kind of nuanced cybersecurity discussion that companies need — not just another “IoT apocalypse” headline.

Want to ensure your IoT security posture is strong? Our pentesting team specializes in embedded device security assessments. If you’re concerned about the integrity of your systems, or need someone to act as a critical friend, get in touch to learn how we can help!

Let’s have a discussion.